Is @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum safe to use?

@stdlib/math-base-special-csignum has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (0.2.3). DepScope rates its health at 58/100 (high risk).

What is the latest version of @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum?

The latest version of @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum is 0.2.3, released 2026-02-07.

Does @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum.

Is @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum deprecated?

No, @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum is actively maintained. Latest release: 0.2.3 (2026-02-07).

What are alternatives to @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum?

Popular alternatives to @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum in npm include: semver, ansi-styles, minimatch, debug, brace-expansion.

What license does @stdlib/math-base-special-csignum use?

@stdlib/math-base-special-csignum is licensed under Apache-2.0.

@stdlib/math-base-special-csignum

npmv0.2.3

Evaluate the signum function of a double-precision complex floating-point number.

License Apache-2.0permissive12 versions4 maintainers7 deps

git://github.com/stdlib-js/math-base-special-csignum

/ 100

Health

safe to use

@stdlib/[email protected] is safe to use (health: 58/100)

Health breakdown0 – 100

20/25

maintenance

0/20

popularity

25/25

security

9/15

maturity

4/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Bundle & TypeScript

🌟

TypeScript

10/10typed

bundled

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

Dependencies (7)

@stdlib/complex-float64-ctor @stdlib/complex-float64-imag @stdlib/complex-float64-real @stdlib/complex-float64-reim @stdlib/math-base-napi-unary @stdlib/math-base-special-cabs @stdlib/utils-library-manifest

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/npm/@stdlib/math-base-special-csignum