Is @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker safe to use?

@daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker has no known vulnerabilities on the latest version (1.0.5). DepScope rates its health at 41/100 (high risk).

What is the latest version of @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker?

The latest version of @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker is 1.0.5, released 2023-04-28.

Does @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker have known vulnerabilities?

No known vulnerabilities on the latest version of @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker.

Is @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker deprecated?

No, @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker is actively maintained. Latest release: 1.0.5 (2023-04-28).

What are alternatives to @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker?

Popular alternatives to @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker in npm include: semver, debug, ansi-styles, minimatch, brace-expansion.

What license does @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker use?

@daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker is licensed under MIT.

@daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker

npmv1.0.5

Loki Chrome docker target

License MITpermissive7 versions1 maintainers8 deps7 weekly dl

oblador/loki

/ 100

Health

use with caution

@daveholst/[email protected] low health (41/100) — consider alternatives

Moderate health score (41/100) — verify manually

Health breakdown0 – 100

0/25

maintenance

0/20

popularity

25/25

security

9/15

maturity

7/15

community

Vulnerabilities

none known

Bundle & TypeScript

🌟

TypeScript

0/10untyped

No type definitions available

Health History

Dependency Tree

License Audit

Dependencies (8)

@loki/core @daveholst/loki-target-chrome-core chrome-remote-interface debug execa fs-extra get-port wait-on

API access

Get this data programmatically — free, no authentication.

curl https://depscope.dev/api/check/npm/@daveholst/loki-target-chrome-docker